Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Artem v. New England Law | Boston, et al
as 21-1646
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE ARTEM
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT P. BROWN, in his official capacity as President and Dean of New England Law, ALLISON M. DUSSIAS, in her official capacity as co-acting Dean and Professor of Academic Excellence of New England Law, LISA R. FREUDENHEIM, in her official capacity as co-acting Dean and Professor of Academic Excellence of New England Law and others
Specht v. The City of New York
as 20-4211
Defendant / Appellee:
John David Lynn, Thomas R. Kane and The City of New York
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott P. Specht
Plymouth County Retirement v. Patterson Companies, Inc., et al
as 20-8013
Petitioner:
Scott P. Anderson and Patterson Companies, Inc.
Respondent:
Plymouth County Retirement System, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Scott Clews, et al v. County of Schuylkill
as 20-2216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT P. CLEWS, JOSEPH S. POTHERING and DEBRA M. DETWEILER
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SCHUYLKILL
Scott MacDonald v. United States
as 20-1986
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Scott P. MacDonald
US v. Bilodeau
as 19-2292
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN BILODEAU
Amicus Curiae:
SCOTT P. BLOOMBERG
Klein v. Black et al
as 2:2019cv00678
Defendant:
Shauna Black and Scott P. Black
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Strochak
as 9:2019cv81164
Defendant:
Scott P. Strochak
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Pemberton v. Anderson et al
as 0:2018cv02818
Defendant:
John D. Buck, Sarena S. Lin, Tim Rogan and others
Plaintiff:
Sally Pemberton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
