Cases 11 - 20 of 337
Schanz et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Ashley Schanz and Sebastian Schanz
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act
Jesus Marcos v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jesus Marcos
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Marcos v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jesus Marcos
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 0:2023mc62400
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG, LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
ROSE v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2023cv23321
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROSE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Interested Party:
CELLULAR TOUCH WIRELESS, INC
Doe v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 4:2023cv05166
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc and Wireless Vision LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
