Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Brett Bogus v. Harris County District Atty, et al
as 19-20840
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JOHN MENNA, GLADYS SHIRLEY FITZGERALD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRETT DAVID BOGUS
Hasseh El Bey et al v. Makeba Mims et al
as 2:2018cv04832
Plaintiff:
Shanise Marie Alexander, Sheila Ann Alexander, Basia El Bey and others
Defendant:
Ms. Delgado, Does, Deldeloris Douglas and others
La Thi Hoang v. Douglas Stern et al
as 2:2017cv05096
Defendant:
Sharon Bailey, Raymond Barragan, Charlie Beck and others
Plaintiff:
Lan Thi Hoang
Edward J. Pierce et al v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB et al
as 2:2017cv04512
Defendant:
Mike Aleali, Michael R. Asatourian, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jeannie B. Hobert and Edward J. Pierce
George Cleveland, III v. Clayton GA Police Department
as 15-7277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAYTON GA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF LINDSEY OWENS, individually and in her official capacity, ASST CHIEF ANDY STRAIT, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv03188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Tony Taylor
as 11-5319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TONY TAYLOR
HUTH, et.al. v. BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC. et al.
as 2:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. HUTH , MARGARET FUNDRELLA , VALERIE A. FRICK and others
Defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY and B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Tony Taylor
as 08-4920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY TAYLOR, a/k/a Lil' Tony
US v. Tony Taylor
as 08-4164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TONY TAYLOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
