Cases 11 - 20 of 2,301
Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project et al v. United States Department of Health And Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv06740
Plaintiff:
Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, Center for Constitutional Rights and L. B.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health And Human Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Dongdong Ma v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv06184
Defendant:
Rosemary Langley Melville, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Dongdong Ma
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State Of Texas et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2024cv00306
Defendant:
Patrick J Lechleiter, United States Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Plaintiff:
State of South Carolina, State of Wyoming, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project Incorporated v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project Incorporated
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Alkoudmani et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv02215
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Nasser Selo and Rasha Alkoudmani
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
General Land Office v. Kinder
as 24-40447
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Texas, Dawn Buckingham, Commissioner, Medical Doctor and others
Movant:
Posillico Civil, Incorporated, Coastal Environmental Group, Incorporated, doing business as Southern Border Constructors, Southern Border Communities Coalition, Texas Sterling Construction Company and others
Mary Mourad A. Boghdadi et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2024cv01633
Defendant:
United States and Citizenship and Immigration Services, Matthew D. Emrich, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Katherein Raef R. Faltaous, Raef Ramsis F. Masoud, Youssef Raef R. Faltaous and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State Of Texas et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Kansas and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Troy Miller, Office of Management and Budget and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff:
Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona and Kino Border Initiative
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
