Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Vardi et al
as 1:2022cv20581
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Shawn Vardi and SM Think Clinton LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Ronald Brown, Jr. v. Miller Seabrooks
as 21-2366
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RONALD LEE BROWN, JR.
Defendant / Appellant:
MILLER SEABROOKS and S&M MOVING AND STORAGE, d/b/a SM Moving & Storage, d/b/a S&M Moving
Khalil v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2021cv10351
Plaintiff:
Ehab Khalil
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Giovanni Caforio, Charles Bancroft and others
Petitioner:
Mangrove Partners Master Fund, LTD
Interested Party:
SM Merger/Arbitrage, L.P., SM Investors, L.P. and SM Investors II, L.P.
Michael Hudson, Jr. v. Steve Sinclaire, et al
as 21-35868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SAMUEL HUDSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE SINCLAIRE, DOC Secretary (currently retired), ROBERT HERZOG, Assistant Secretary - Prison Division, DANIELLE ARMBRUSTER, Assistant Secretary - Reentry Division and others
DANIELI CORPORATION et al v. SMS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
DANIELI CORPORATION and DANIELI & C. OFFICINE MECCANICHE S.P.A.
Defendant:
SMS GROUP, INC., SMS GROUP GMBH and STEEL DYNAMICS, INC.
KM v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free S
as 21-2156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KM, individually, and on behalf of IM, a minor and SM, individually, and on behalf of IM, a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00027
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00031
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00029
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00030
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
