Cases 21 - 30 of 797
United States of America v. Balouchzehi
as 23-7609
Defendant / Appellant:
MALEK MOHAMMAD BALOUCHZEHI, Malek Khan and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Khan v. Qatar Airways Corporation
as 4:2023cv04138
Plaintiff:
Mariam Khan
Defendant:
Qatar Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default
KHAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01911
Petitioner:
AMIR J. KHAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Khan v. Bibi
as 1:2023cv04645
Plaintiff:
Sajid Ali Khan
Defendant:
Anwa Bibi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
LifeVoxel.AI Inc. et al v. Khan et al
as 3:2023cv01313
Plaintiff:
LifeVoxel.AI Inc., AI Visualize Inc., Kovey Kovalan and others
Defendant:
Amjad Khan, Ethan Brown, BROWN NERI SMITH & KHAN LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu et al
as 3:2023cv04620
Defendant:
Thiruvenkatasamy, Senthilrajan, Pradeep Puli Rukmangatha Sairam Babu and others
Plaintiff:
Nagarajan Duraisamy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Abdul Khan
as 23-6877
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ABDUL WAHAB KHAN
Shaheryar Khan, et al v. Nancy CurryIn re: Shaheryar Khan, et al v. Nancy Curry
as 23-55731
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SHAHERYAR KHAN
Appellant:
SHAHERYAR KHAN
Appellee:
NANCY K. CURRY, Trustee
United States of America v. Gorgeech (Niamatullah Gorgeech)
as 23-6921
Defendant:
MAULABAKSH GORGEECH, Sealed Defendant 1 and Maula Baksh
Defendant / Appellant:
NIAMATULLAH GORGEECH and Son of Hakeem Jamal Khan
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
