Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 308
Ramirez Avalos v. Garland
as 22-1716
Petitioner: EPIFANIO RAMIREZ AVALOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Doherty et al v. Capital Link Management LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01951
Plaintiff: Tracy Doherty, Eduardo Avalos, Caitlin Stables and others
Defendant: Capital Link Management LLC, Jonathan Rinker and Samuel Piccione
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sonia Avalos v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1567
Petitioner: SONIA MERCEDES AVALOS and M.E.C.A.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Avalos v. Garland
as 22-60279
Petitioner: Santos Adolfo Avalos, Adolfo Avalos-Aviles, Cristian Adoris Avalos-Aviles and others
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00787
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
R4 Transportation and Logistics LLC, et al v. J.A.G. Express Corporation, et al
as 22-10734
Plaintiff / Appellant: R4 TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS LLC and E2 LOGISTICS LLC
Defendant / Appellee: J.A.G. EXPRESS CORPORATION, AMERICAN GROWIN BUSINESS CORP., PABLO DAMIAN GOROSITO and others
Avalos-Cardona v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1406
Petitioner: GERMAN AVALOS-CARDONA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rios Avalos v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1170
Petitioner: JOSE ANTONIO RIOS AVALOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States v. Daniel De La Cruz-Avalos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2947
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Daniel De La Cruz-Avalos
USA v. Victor Avalos
as 21-50151
Defendant / Appellant: VICTOR HUGO AVALOS
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?