Cases 21 - 30 of 12,948
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ANDREWS et al v. JPA R/E ASSOCIATES, L.P. et al
as 2:2024cv02371
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ANDREWS, JOSE DATIL, EDWARD FLACH and others
Defendant:
JPA R/E ASSOCIATES, L.P., THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH PEZZANO, BOND, PEZZANO, & ETZE P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
United States of America v. Andrews
as 24-1479
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ANDREWS and LYNN COOKE ANDREWS
Defendant:
WESLEY W. ANDREWS, COLTON C. ANDREWS and ELLERY E. ANDREWS
United States v. Corey Barr
as 24-2114
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Corey Andrew Barr
Anbang Group Holdings Co. Limited, et al. v. Zhou, et al.
as 24-3419
Not Yet Classified:
AB STABLE IX LLC, AB STABLE VIII LLC, ANBANG GROUP HOLDINGS CO. LIMITED and others
Defendant:
HAIBIN ZHOU, also known as Hai Bin Zhou also known as Andrew Zhou also known as Andy Bang also known as Joe Martin, WORLD AWARD FOUNDATION INC., YAN ZHAO, ATTORNEY and others
Gill v. bluebird bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10803
Plaintiff:
Garry Gill and Larry Cattran
Defendant:
bluebird bio, Inc., Andrew Obenshain, Christopher Krawtschuk and others
Petitioner:
Ron Zizman
William Joiner v. Channel 5 LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
William G Joiner
Defendant:
Channel 5 LLC, Andrew Callaghan, Evan Gilbert-Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
United States of America v. SLSCO, LP
as 24-1460
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCSHERRY and LISA PALMA MCSHERRY
Defendant:
SLSCO, LP, DBA Slsco, Ltd., DBA Sullivan Land services, Ltd., BAUMGARDNER HOUSE RAISING, LLC, DBA Baumgartner House Lifting, THE CITY OF NEW YORK and others
US v. Anthony Andrews
as 24-6513
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY ANDREWS, a/k/a Wheat
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
