Cases 21 - 30 of 121
SHANK v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as PAM/1:20-CV-01536
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC, Teva Women's Health LLC, TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
SHANK and Dawn Shank
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Abbvie Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01621
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS SALES CORP, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC and MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, Series
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Abbvie Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00892
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Duramed Pharmaceuticals Sales Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, MSPA Claims 1, LLC and MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, Series
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
People of The State of California v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00923
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN v. ACTAVIS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN
Defendant:
APOTEX CORP. , DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD., FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louisiana Health Svc & Indemnity Co, Inc v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 3:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al
as 3:2014cv00919
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 3:2014cv00857
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al
as MN/0:14-cv-01641
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. , Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
