Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Goldman Schwartz, Inc. et al
as 2:2013mc00158
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Goldman Schwartz, Inc., Debtcom, Inc., Harris County Check Recovery, Inc. and others
Receiver: Charlene Koonce
Federal Trade Commission v. Goldman Schwartz, Inc. et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00106
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Goldman Schwartz Inc. , Debtcom, Inc. , Harris County Check Recovery Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Poindexter et al v. Stuteville et al
as 5:2012cv00031
Plaintiff: Chris Poindexter and Pridex Construction LLC
Defendant: Jack Stuteville, Michael Mecklenburg, TMC Construction Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04134
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Christopher Wright We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3467
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER G. WRIGHT
In re: Phillip G. Wright
as 09-9019
: In re: Phillip G. Wright
WRIGHT v. TAVISTOCK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2009cv01165
Plaintiff: CLIFTON G. WRIGHT
Defendant: TAVISTOCK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, COBRIN, STARKMAN, MCGRATH & CO. and COHEN & WILLWERTH, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lena G. Wright v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-66809
Plaintiff: Lena G. Wright
Defendant: Zurn Industries, Inc.
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008mc00001
Plaintiff: Nancy G. Wright
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Grant et al v. Parker et al
as 2:2007cv00651
Plaintiff: Nancy Jo Grant and Kevin Edwin Daughtrey
Defendant: James S. Parker, Robert B. Bennett, Jr., Lee E. Haworth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?