Cases 21 - 30 of 50
USA v. Cedric Rose
as 13-10586
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CEDRIC ROSE, also known as John Wayne
CAMPBELL et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00324
Plaintiff:
JUANITA CAMPBELL , BERNIS ALFORD, JR. , ARIAL MAULDIN PROPERTIES, LLC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Bridges v. Weatherford International Ltd. et al
as 4:2013cv00214
Defendant:
Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford U.S. L.P. and Integrity Delaware, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Bridges
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
In the Matter of v. Walker-Turner
as 1:2012mc00314
Petitioner:
In the Matter of
Respondent:
John Wayne Walker-Turner, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceeding
United States of America v. Vassell
as 12-3263
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eric Vassell, AKA King James, AKA Barry, AKA Bego, AKA The King, AKA The Don, AKA The IRS, AKA Gladstone Greenwood, Robert W. Bell, AKA Diamond, AKA Bell Wayne, AKA Waynee, Paul A. Moore, AKA Bodymove and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald Vassell, AKA Crat
USA v. John Washington
as 12-10044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE WASHINGTON
John Ferguson v. FAA
as 11-72569
Petitioner:
JOHN WAYNE FERGUSON
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
USA v. John Washington
as 11-10315
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE WASHINGTON
-ARL Zysk et al v. Smith
as 2:2003cv04334
802) 442-7861 (fax:
John Wayne Smith and John Wayne Smith
Counter Defendant:
Irene K. Zysk and Robert J. Zysk
Plaintiff:
Irene K. Zysk and Robert J. Zysk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
