Cases 21 - 30 of 202
United States v. Charging Crow
as 22-8011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUES ALAN CHARGING CROW
US v. Deonte Curry
as 21-4713
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEONTE MARQUES CURRY
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marques et al
as 4:2021cv09796
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
John Marques and Lifeline Innovations & Insurance Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Marques Borney v. Brian Kibler
as 21-71318
Petitioner:
MARQUES BORNEY
Respondent:
BRIAN KIBLER, Warden
US v. Ayala-Vazquez
as 21-1734
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL AYALA-VAZQUEZ, a/k/a El Buster, a/k/a El Negro, a/k/a Angelo Millones Papa Upa
Interested Party:
MABEL MERCADO-LOPEZ, MARIA-DE-LOURDES MARQUES-GARCIA, ALEXIS ROBLEDO-VAZQUEZ and others
United States of America v. Johnson (Green)
as 21-2244
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Latique Johnson, Ines Sanchez, AKA Meth, Donnell Murray, AKA Don P and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Brandon Green, AKA Light, AKA Moneywell
PACHECO QUIROS et al v. AMADOR et al
as 1:2021cv02433
Plaintiff:
Katherine Daniela Pacheco Quiros, Edgar Jose Dvila Rivero, Suheil Cartaya Villanueva and others
Defendant:
KATHRYN ABATE, Molly Amador, Jacqueline Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Ashmore et al v. Marques et al
as 3:2021mc80227
Plaintiff:
Beattie B. Ashmore, Joseph P. Hipp, Kraig S. Aiken and others
Defendant:
John Marques, Lifeline Innovations and Insurance Solutions LLC
US v. Deonte Curry
as 21-4457
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEONTE MARQUES CURRY
SkinnySchool LLC et al v. Google LLC
as 1:2021cv07045
Plaintiff:
SkinnySchool LLC doing business as Maria Marques Fitness and Mint Rose Day Spa LLC
Defendant:
Google L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
