Cases 21 - 30 of 233
Vapor Train 2 v. FDA
as 22-60570
Petitioner:
Vapor Train 2, L.L.C. and Magellan Technology, Incorporated
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VAPOR CRAFT LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VAPOR CRAFT LLC, MELISSA D. ANDERSON and MELISSA D ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. Soul Vapor, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Soul Vapor, LLC and Aurelius Jeffrey
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0301 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Kealani Distribution LLC et al v. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 4:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
Kealani Distribution LLC, United States Vaping Association, Inc., Diamond Vapor LLC and others
Defendant:
Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D. and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Schmitendorf v. Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02293
Plaintiff:
BRADY SCHMITENDORF
Defendant:
JUICY'S VAPOR LOUNGE INC. and Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
American Vapor v. FDA
as 22-60040
Petitioner:
American Vapor, Incorporated
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
Philip Morris Products S.A. v. ITC
as 22-1227
Appellant:
PHILIP MORRIS PRODUCTS S.A., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
RAI STRATEGIC HOLDINGS, INC., R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
American Vapor v. FDA
as 21-60916
Petitioner:
American Vapor, Incorporated
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
Cool Breeze Vapor L.L.C. v. FDA
as 21-1205
Petitioner:
Cool Breeze Vapor L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration
Pop Vapor Co. LLC v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
as 21-13522
Petitioner:
POP VAPOR CO. LLC
Respondent:
U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
