Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant:
Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Charles Larry Crews, Jr. v. Rivian Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01524
Plaintiff:
Charles Larry Crews, Jr.
Defendant:
Rivian Automotive, Inc., Robert J. Scaringe, Claire McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Crews, Jr. v. RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01433
Plaintiff:
Charles Larry Crews, Jr.
Defendant:
RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., ROBERT J. SCARINGE, CLAIRE MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022mc00049
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 0:2022mc00012
Respondent:
Bank of America Corporation
Petitioner:
The City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor of Baltimore, City Council of Baltimore and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
In re American Capital Realties Litigation
as 1:2015cv00421
Defendant:
American Capital Realties Litigation, American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., Arc Properties Operating Partnership L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, College Retirement Equities Fund, Tiaa-Cref Equity Index Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
IBEW Local 353 Pension Plan v. Eargo, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08747
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local 353 Pension Plan
Defendant:
Eargo, Inc., Christian Gormsen, Adam Laponis and others
Petitioner:
Xiaobin Cai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re: Farfetch Limited Securi
as 21-2752
Plaintiff:
Jeff Omdahl and Jeff Omdahl, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IAM National Pension Fund and Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Defendant / Appellee:
Farfetch Limited, Jose Neves, Elliot Jordan and others
Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and Patricia Grossberg Living Trust
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, William P. Boardman, Frank Paul Bramble, Sr and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation, Kenneth D Lewis and Joseph L. Price
Petitioner:
Sjunde Ap-Fonden, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, KBC Asset Management NV and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Gaia Holdings Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Comptroller of the Currency, OCC, US Treasury Dept. and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its Corporate capacity
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
