Cases 31 - 40 of 773
Xiaoxuan v. Mascon
as 4:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
Yan Xiaoxuan
Defendant:
Nicholas Carey Mascon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ed Baeza et al v. Reliant Life Shares, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Ed Baeza, Concepcion Baeza, Ansary Bassir and others
Defendant:
Reliant Life Shares, LLC, RLS Financial Services, Inc., RMS Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal - SEC Act
USA v. Carey Hinton
as 23-1018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAREY HINTON
Freeman v. Burbank et al
as 2:2022cv01903
Plaintiff:
Scott Freeman
Defendant:
Russell Burbank, Stephen Hurst, Sunray Asset Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CAREY v. USA
as 1:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
ELISA CAREY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA v. Carey Mills
as 22-10304
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAREY MILLS
Freeman v. Burbank et al
as 3:2022cv05022
Plaintiff:
Scott Freedman and Scott Freeman
Defendant:
Russell Burbank, Stephen Hurst, Sunray Asset Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rudolph Carey, III v. Nelson Smith
as 22-1908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH CAREY, III
Defendant / Appellee:
NELSON SMITH, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
