Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Terrance James-Bey v. NC Dept. of Public Safety
as 19-7093
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ALSTON, KIMBERLY D. GRANDE, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY, a/k/a Terrance Lamount James, a/k/a T. L. James-Bey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00886
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Davis
as 19-874
Defendant:
Corey J. Rivers, Jennifer M. Gourley, Ryan V. Potter and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Monae Davis
Mareno v. ProShares Trust II et al
as 1:2019cv01955
Defendant:
SG Americas Securities, LLC, jefferies llc, Virtu Financial BD LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James D Mareno
Petitioner:
Stacy Smith, Fei Liu, Kershner Trading Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Bittner v. ProShares Trust II et al
as 1:2019cv01840
Defendant:
SG Americas Securities, LLC, Jefferies LLC, Virtu Financial BD LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Bittner
Petitioner:
Stacy Smith, Fei Liu, Kershner Trading Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ramirez v. Bloom
as 19-89
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Tandra L. Dawson, Jeffrey M. Kimelman, Montano Armando Montano and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez, Propia Persona - Sui Juris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services v. Askins et al
as 6:2018cv00844
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant:
Shirley Askins, Michelle Benson, Tammy DelaCruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
