Cases 31 - 40 of 3,211
Anderson v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al.
as 5:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Christine Anderson
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner:
CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
WHITLOCK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E WHITLOCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Christine Wormuth, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Television Tower, Inc. v. Elizabeth Goldberg
as 24-142
Petitioner:
TELEVISION TOWER, INC.
Respondent:
ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG, MYRIAM RALSTON, BENJAMIN ROBERTS and others
Skyline Tower Painting, Inc. v. Elizabeth Goldberg
as 24-141
Petitioner:
SKYLINE TOWER PAINTING, INC.
Respondent:
ELIZABETH L. GOLDBERG, MYRIAM RALSTON, BENJAMIN ROBERTS and others
Forbes v. The United States Army et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Forbes
Defendant:
The United States Army and Christine E. Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
