Cases 31 - 40 of 54,997
Fredricks v. Detective John Doe
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
NIGEL FREDRICKS
Defendant:
Detective MICHAEL ARDOLINO, Detective DERRICK RUSS, Detective MARK SCARLATELLI and others
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 24-1309
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, LISA FITZPATRICK, sued in their individual and official capacities, NIGEL MARKS, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Ethel Matthews v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04045
Plaintiff:
Ethel Matthews
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Randhir Gandhi, Does 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. U.S. Marine Corps et al
as 7:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Marine Corps and John - Jane Does 1 -50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bowman, et al. v. Novad Management Consulting, LLC, et al.
as 24-3063
Plaintiff:
KEYUBBA BOWMAN and RASHON BOWMAN
Defendant:
NOVAD MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Corporation, ISN CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
John Rad v. Mitra Nabati et al
as 2:2024cv03996
Plaintiff:
John Rad
Defendant:
Mitra Nabati, Individually and as Trustee of the Mitra Nabati Survivor's Trust and as Trustee of the Bahram Nabati Unified Credit Trust, Pejman Sage and Does 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Faramarz Taghilou v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv03987
Plaintiff:
Faramarz Taghilou
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and John Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WILGUS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
JAMES VINCENT WILGUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Laccinole v. Sun Basket, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Sun Basket, Inc. and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership v. Liu
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
HUZHOU HUIRONGSHENG EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, HUZHOU HUIHENGYING EQUITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP and HUZHOU CHUANGTAI RONGYUAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
DUO LIU, ST. TOME LLC., ST. FORTUNE GROUP LLC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
