Cases 31 - 40 of 1,239
ETC SUNOCO HOLDINGS LLC et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv03279
Plaintiff:
ETC SUNOCO HOLDINGS LLC, SUNOCO (R&M), LLC, SUNOCO, INC. (R&M) and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
ENERGY TRANSFER OPERATING, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
ETC Sunoco Holdings LLC et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2020cv03671
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
Sunoco (R&M), LLC (f/k/a Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), ETC Sunoco Holdings LLC (f/k/a Sunoco, Inc.), Sunoco (R&M), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Beccela's Etc., LLC v. Commscope, Inc., et al
as 8:2020cv01738
Defendant:
Commscope, Inc., Ruckus Networks and Kenneth Matthews
Plaintiff:
Beccela's Etc., LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
R.M.S. Titanic, Incorporated v. US
as 20-1936
Defendant:
D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
Kinfe-Michael Negash v. Kingstowne Residential Owners
as 20-1884
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART HEADQUARTERS, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, FBI HEADQUARTERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINFE-MICHAEL NEGASH
PMJ Capital Corp. v. The Lady Antoinette
as 20-3085
Counter Claimant:
Antoinette Bauco and Frank Bauco
Defendant:
New York Athletic Club and The Lady Antoinette, her boilers, engines, tackler, machinery, equipment, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Plaintiff:
PMJ Capital Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Negash v. Kingstowne Residential Owners Corporation and Involved Persons and Associates et al
as 1:2020cv00854
Defendant:
Bangladesh, BJ's, U.S. House of Representatives and others
Plaintiff:
Kinfe-Michael Negash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Precision Associates, Inc et al v. Panalpina World Transport (Holding) LTD. et al
as 1:2008cv00042
Defendant:
Spedlogswiss, Morrison Express Corporation (USA), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Frances Wright, Gabby Gottlieb doing business as Ego Communications/Cantrade, Dan Weatherly doing business as Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sunward International Inc., David Howell Product Design Inc., d/b/a David Howell & Company, Mary Elle Fashions, d/b/a Meridian Electric and others
Intervenor:
Sony Electronics, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Dell, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Garden City Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. US
as 20-1684
Defendant:
D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
