Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Daniel Etheridge v. J. Soto
as 12-73548
Petitioner: DANIEL ETHERIDGE
Respondent: J. SOTO
Etheridge Oil Company, Inc. v. Brown et al
as 5:2012mc00036
Plaintiff: Etheridge Oil Company, Inc.
Defendant: Thomas E. Brown, III, Michael K. Barnes , W. Watson Barnes and others
Etheridge et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as GAN/2:12-cv-00045
Plaintiff: Carol Etheridge and James Etheridge
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corp.
Felix v. Holder
as 12-1143
Petitioner: MARK FELIX, JR., a/k/a Benito Cadet, a/k/a Ronald Etheridge, a/k/a Thomas Griffin, a/k/a Kendall Jefferson, a/k/a Dameon Johnson, a/k/a Mark Johnson, a/k/a Troy Smith, a/k/a Troy William, a/k/a Brian Durate, a/k/a Michael Phillips, a/k/a Billy Walker, a/k
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Silletti v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02604
Defendant: Renee Etheridge and The City of New York
Plaintiff: Christine Silletti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Etheridge v. F. Haw
as 10-73907
Petitioner: DANIEL ETHERIDGE
Respondent: F. B. HAWS
Etheridge v. Medtronic, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02649
Plaintiff: Gladys Etheridge and Gladys Etheridge
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Ernest R. Etheridge, et al. v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77771
Defendant: A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff: Ernest R. Etheridge
Zahran et al v. Columbus Development Authority et al
as 1:2009cv00211
Plaintiff: Robin Zahran, Karen Zahran and American Consumer Products Corporation
Defendant: Columbus Development Authority, Columbus Economic Development Corporation, Columbus, Georgia Chamber of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Etheridge v. Grogan
as 2:2008mc00009
Plaintiff: Dwight Etheridge
Defendant: Barandon Grogan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?