Cases 31 - 40 of 60
US v. Derrick Lewi
as 12-4665
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DERRICK LEWIS, a/k/a Chip, a/k/a Ski, a/k/a Mark Jones
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
Not Classified By Court:
PURDUE PHARMA COMPANY, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BEN VENUE LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH VANDERWAL, VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant:
CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant:
AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party:
MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
ROTHBERG et al v. MARGER et al
as 1:2011cv05497
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. ROTHBERG and THERESA ROTHBERG
Defendant:
SARANNE ROTHBERG MARGER, THE ESTATE OF SIDNEY ROTHBERG, NELLIE INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1055
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
USA v. Juan Jone
as 11-14008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN MARK JONES
Lachkovich v. Bush et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Lachkovich
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Mark Sullivan, Richard Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner:
DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR., LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Respondent:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, APOTHECON, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1054
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, CARPENTERS & MILLWRIGHTS OF HOUSTON AND VICINITY WELFARE TRUST FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Carpenters & Millwrights of Houston and Vicinity Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMRA JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
