Cases 31 - 40 of 374
MacDonaldIn re: MacDonald
as 22-1319
Petitioner:
In re: KINLEY MACDONALD
Respondent:
LOU ANN SUTTON, Judge, ROBERT MULHERN, Judge, MICHAEL A. DUDDY, Judge and others
James MacDonald, et al v. Shereen Koules, et alIn re: James MacDonald, et al v. Shereen Koules, et al
as 22-55383
Debtor:
In the Matter of: LONNIE TODD MOORE
Appellant:
JAMES MACDONALD
Appellee:
SHEREEN ARAZM KOULES and DAVID HILTY
Globaltranz Enterprises LLC v. Pinnacle Logistics Group LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Globaltranz Enterprises LLC
Defendant:
Pinnacle Logistics Group LLC, Nicholas Jarvis, Unknown Jarvis and others
Fortune International, LLC v. Timothy MacDonald
as 1:2022cv01760
Plaintiff:
Fortune International, LLC d/b/a Fortune Fish & Gourmet
Defendant:
Timothy MacDonald d/b/a Maine Fresh Seafood
BUSHNELL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
PRUDENCE BUSHNELL, RICHARD BUCKLEY, SUSAN BUSHNELL and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Darren MacDonald v. West Capital Lending, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Darren MacDonald
Defendant:
West Capital Lending, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Darren MacDonald v. E Mortgage Capital, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Darren MacDonald
Defendant:
E Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Scott MacDonald v. United States
as 22-1321
Petitioner:
Scott P. MacDonald
Respondent:
United States of America
Nation v. US
as 22-1256
Plaintiff:
MARK WAYNE NATION, MICHAEL JOE HORTON, KENNETH DESHAWN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD RODRICK MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
