Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 374
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Biden
as 23-40671
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant: President Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Department of Labor, Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor: State of New Jersey
State of Utah v. Su
as 23-11097
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant / Appellee: Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant: Members of Congress
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Defendant: EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
In Re: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff: The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Respondent: Zinc Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
as 2:2023md03080
In Re: INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Defendant: EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: HON. JOSEPH A. DICKSON
Plaintiff: THE STATE OF MONTANA, EX. REL., THE STATE OF KANSAS EX. REL., TIMOTHY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Preferred Care Developmental Centers of Mississippi, Inc. et al v. State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
as 4:2023cv00798
Debtor: Lincoln Residential Center and Rolling Hills Developmental Center
Appellant: Preferred Care Developmental Center of Mississippi, Inc doing business as Canton Manor and Preferred Care Development Center of Mississippi, Inc doing business as Delta Manor
Appellee: State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
Not Classified By Court: Case Admin Sup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK Case
Preferred Care Developmental Centers of Mississippi, Inc. et al v. State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
as 3:2023cv00486
Appellant: Preferred Care Developmental Centers of Mississippi, Inc. doing business as Canton Manor, et al and Delta Manor
Appellee: State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
In re: Google LLC
as 23-910
Petitioner: Google, LLC
Respondent: The State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?