Cases 41 - 50 of 2,451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH, INC. v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv22117
Plaintiff:
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH, INC.
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Blackhawk Network, Inc. et al v. Myers
as 1:2023cv12644
Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Network, Inc., Robert F. Paradise and Michael Bonacci
Defendant:
Patricia W. Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
United States v. Joseph Myers, Jr.
as 23-3399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Paul Myers, Jr.
Philip Myers v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3286
Petitioner:
Philip Myers
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Mayo Clinic et al v. Celgene Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05144
Plaintiff:
Mayo Clinic and Lifepoint Corporate Services, General Partnership
Defendant:
Celgene Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Natco Pharma Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sommers v. Myers
as 5:2023cv06128
Plaintiff:
Mr John Marcus Sommers, John Marcus Sommers and Lee Sommers
Defendant:
Gary Myers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dale Sundby v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70169
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DALE SUNDBY, JEFFREY MYERS, KATHLEEN MYERS and others
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
