Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 734
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04369
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Clifton Currie
as 22-4718
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CLIFTON DELWAYN CURRIE
USA v. Pape
as 22-40806
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Clifton Pape
Clifton v. Willis et al
as 1:2022cv03161
Plaintiff: Dennis Clifton
Defendant: Brent Willis, Fred Cooper, Tim Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Reddy, et al v. Foster, et al
as 16-1432
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARY ROSE REDDY, SUE CLIFTON, JENNIFER ROBIDOUX and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH A. FOSTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of New Hampshire, D. CHRIS MCLAUGHLIN, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Cheshire County, NH, SCOTT W. MURRAY, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Merrimack County, NH and others
Defendant: THOMAS P. VELARDI, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Strafford County, NH and DERRY, NH
USA v. Goudeau
as 22-20567
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Clifton Joseph Goudeau, Jr.
In re: Clifton Batts
as 22-2037
Petitioner: In re: CLIFTON WILLIAM BATTS
Morrow v. Robertson
as 22-1102
Petitioner: CLIFTON MORROW
Respondent: JAMES ROBERTSON, WARDEN
USA v. Clifton Peter
as 22-30150
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CLIFTON FRANK PETER
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. KOPPEL, M.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03413
Defendant: BRIAN BEAGIN, D.C., CLIFTON PAIN AND REHAB LLC, VINCENT SARACENO, D.C. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?