Cases 41 - 50 of 1,159
Stephen Dopudja et al v. West Yost and Associates, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dopudja and Jon Wells
Defendant:
WEST YOST & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation, Charles Duncan, Ernie Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BETA PHARMA, INC. v. INVENTISBIO (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2023cv21047
Plaintiff:
BETA PHARMA, INC.
Defendant:
INVENTIS BIOTECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO. LTD., Dr. YUEHENG JIANG, Dr. WANSHENG LIU and others
Liu v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv08702
Plaintiff:
ZENGZENG LIU
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SUN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
YING SUN and PENG LIU
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN and LISA K. HELLER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Liu v. Garland
as 23-7054
Petitioner:
YI MEI LIU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
PRICE et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
DANITA PRICE, EDWARD PRICE, QINGHUA WANG and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02494
Not Classified By Court:
SHICAI LIU
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY LIU HUANG et al
as 2:2023mc00115
In Re:
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY LIU HUANG
Petitioner:
LI HUANG
YU et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
ALAN ZHIHUAI YU, YING ZHAO, ANNIE DANZHAI HU and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
