Cases 41 - 50 of 644
Pfizer Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 19-1876
Appellant:
PFIZER INC.
Appellee:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Pfizer Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 19-1871
Appellant:
PFIZER INC.
Appellee:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
JUDAY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02037
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
PAT JUDAY and CHRIS JUDAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02011
Plaintiff:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Defendant:
WENDY J. WATSON and PFIZER INC.
Witmer v. Immune Design Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00532
Defendant:
David Baltimore, Susan L. Kelley, Lewis Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
In re: Rotavirus Vaccines
as 19-1405
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUGARTOWN PEDIATRICS LLC, SCHWARTZ PEDIATRICS SC and MARGIOTTI & KROLL PEDIATRICS PC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO OBTAIN TESTIMONY OF DR. WILLIAM P. HAUSDORFF FOR THE USE IN A A FOREIGN PROCEEDING et al
as 1:2019mc00028
In Re:
FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO OBTAIN TESTIMONY OF DR. WILLIAM P. HAUSDORFF FOR THE USE IN A A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
Petitioner:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK CANADA INC.
Chris Juday, et al v. Merck & Co Inc, et al
as 19-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAT JUDAY and CHRIS JUDAY
Defendant:
ANN REDFIELD
Ford v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20079
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(DPP)CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
