Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Betts v. Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Betts
Defendant:
Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wright v. Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery Inc.
as 0:2014cv62653
Plaintiff:
Archimore Wright
Defendant:
Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Capital Produce Company v. ML Management Corp. et al
as 8:2014cv00947
Plaintiff:
Capital Produce Company
Defendant:
ML Management Corp., Mamma Lucia of Bethesda, Inc., Mamma Lucia of Columbia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Ryeco, LLC et al v. Five Days Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ryeco, LLC and Eagle Fruit Traders, LLC
Defendant:
Five Days Market, Inc., G-Mart Baltimore, Inc., G-Mart Frederick, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
A&D Auto Sales, Inc. v. US
as 13-5019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A&D AUTO SALES, INC., ALLEY'S OF KINGSPORT, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER JEEP WEST, INC. and others
Respondent:
COLONIAL DODGE, INC. and HOOVER CHRYSLER JEEP INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Amicus Curiae:
SPITZER MOTOR CITY, INC., SPITZER AUTOWORLD AKRON, LLC, SPITZER AUTOWORLD SHEFFIELD, LLC and others
Holmes v. Lockhart Morris Montgomery Inc
as 3:2012mc00007
Defendant:
Lockhart Morris Montgomery Inc
Plaintiff:
Danett Holmes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
