Cases 41 - 50 of 6,935
US v. Douglas Phillips
as 24-4349
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DOUGLAS B. PHILLIPS
Phillips et al v. Energy Northwest
as 4:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
David Holmes and Shannon Buck Phillips
Defendant:
Energy Northwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lewis v. New York State Board Of Elections
as 8:2024cv00849
Defendant:
New York State Board Of Elections
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC v. Paul
as 24-1773
Not Yet Classified:
NATIN PAUL, ATX DEBT FUND 1, LLC and Nate Paul
Plaintiff:
TUEBOR REIT SUB LLC
Defendant:
KARLIN REAL ESTATE LLC, KARLIN ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., KARLIN CESAR CHAVEZ, LLC and others
Warfield v. Tibbet, et al.
as 24-4069
Plaintiff:
BRODERICK JAMES WARFIELD
Defendant:
WALT TIBBET, Executive Official Chief of Police, DONALD A. DUBAIN, Executive Chief Solano County District Attorney, KRISHNA A. ABRAMS, Executive Chief Solano County District Attorney and others
Nash v. Pacheco, et al.
as 24-4020
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP NASH
Defendant:
LAUREN PACHECO, sued in their individual and official capacities, DEBNEY JARAMILLO, sued in their individual and official capacities, GABRIEL WILSON, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
City of Chicago, et al v. Jeffrey I. Cummings
as 24-2093
Petitioner:
CITY OF CHICAGO, PHILLIP CLINE, DANIEL MCWEENY and others
Respondent:
JEFFREY I. CUMMINGS
Interested Party:
ROBERT SMITH, JR.
City of Chicago, et al v. Jeffrey I. Cummings
as 24-2094
Petitioner:
CITY OF CHICAGO, WILLIAM MOSER, JOHN E. BYRNE and others
Respondent:
JEFFREY I. CUMMINGS
Interested Party:
JAMES GIBSON
United States v. Phillip Cutler
as 24-2324
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Phillip J. Cutler
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
