Cases 41 - 50 of 98
William L. Seay v. Thomas H. Casey
as 2:2018cv01167
Defendant:
Thomas H. Casey
U.S.M.C. Ret:
Lt. Col. William L. Seay
Seay v. United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") et al
as 3:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Clant M. Seay
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ("APHIS")
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Seay et al
as 6:2017cv00310
Defendant:
Franklin Venture Corporation, Adem Imeri and Shawn D. Seay
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
In re Robert A. Ferrante
as 8:2017cv01916
Appellee:
Thomas H Casey and Thomas A. Vogele and Associates, APC
In Re Debtor:
Robert A. Ferrante
Appellant:
William Seay
Seay v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (JRG2)
as 3:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tasha Seay
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Engel v. Best et al
as 3:2017cv05082
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Karen Best, Mike Booth, Bob Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Seay et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry et al
as 5:2017cv00682
Plaintiff:
Joseph P Seay and Lois Jacobs
Defendant:
Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Susan Rogers, Audrey Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEAY v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as PAE/2:16-cv-05946
Plaintiff:
SALLY SEAY
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , JANSSEN ORTHO LLC and others
Seay v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as ALS/1:17-cv-00055
Plaintiff:
Shawn K. Seay
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Co. and others
Seay v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2016mc51711
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Seay
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
