Cases 41 - 50 of 160
Bennett v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 4:2011mc09014
Plaintiff:
Cora E Bennett
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Interested_party:
KPMG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Eric Luedike, et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 11-2024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC LUEDIKE, HEATHER WARD, DONALD TRAINOR, III and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Wilkerson v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 4:2011cv01040
Plaintiff:
Gretha Wilkerson
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coronado et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00706
Plaintiff:
Bonofacio Coronado , Jennifer Coronado , Eduardo Coronado and others
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tallal v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 4:2010cv05660
Plaintiff:
Scott Tallal , Al Alberto , Craig Morris and others
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation , Sprint Solutions Inc. , Sprint Spectrum LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tallal v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 3:2010cv05660
Plaintiff:
Scott Tallal
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sprint Nextel Corporation v. ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited
as 1:2010cv01404
Plaintiff:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Defendant:
ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 201
Lockhart et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 4:2010cv05621
Plaintiff:
Arlene Baisa Lockhart and Gene Lockhart
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lockhart et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
as 3:2010cv05621
Plaintiff:
Arlene Baisa Lockhart and Gene Lockhart
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
