Cases 41 - 50 of 697
Saada v. Golan
as 22-1966
Petitioner:
Isacco Jacky Saada
Respondent:
Narkis Aliza Golan
Amicus Curiae:
Sanctuary for Families, Inc., Battered Mothers Custody Conference, Georgetown Law Domestic Violence Clinic and others
STARK v. GRILL CREATIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
as 2:2022cv04894
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STARK
Defendant:
GRILL CREATIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Eddie Starks
as 22-11915
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDDIE D. STARKS
Stark et al v. Patreon, Inc.
as 3:2022cv03131
Plaintiff:
Brayden Stark, Judd Oostyen, Kevin Black and others
Defendant:
Patreon, Inc.
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Kendell Starks
as 22-11426
Petitioner:
In re: KENDELL LEE STARKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Collin County, Texas v. Starke, Jr.
as 4:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Collin County, Texas
Defendant:
Charles B Starke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
STARK v. GRILL CREATIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STARK
Defendant:
GRILL CREATIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 22
Kim v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kyung Tae Kim
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ann Marie Jordan-Starks
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Aminu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Suraka Yahaya Aminu
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ann Marie Jordan-Starks
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Leland Stark
as 21-80123
Respondent:
In re: LELAND ALAN STARK, Esquire, Admitted to Ninth Circuit Bar on February 22, 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
