Cases 41 - 50 of 390
Shen et al
as 2:2021cv08444
Petitioner:
Jiahui (David) Shen, Shipgadget Corp., United Parcel Service, - and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holly Perez v. UPS
as 21-16538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOLLY PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Phillips v. Texas Department of Insurance - Division of Workers Compensation et al
as 3:2021cv02216
Plaintiff:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant:
Texas Department of Insurance - Division of Workers Compensation, Fleming Foods, Raymond Forklift Trucks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norwood v. United Parcel Service
as 21-3145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN NORWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2021mc51017
Applicant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
United Parcel Service, Inc
Falick v. United Parcel Service Co.
as 4:2021cv02441
Plaintiff:
Michael Falick
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Earl Cook v. UPS
as 21-1693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL COOK
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Tyrone Doutherd v. UPS, et al
as 21-15966
Defendant:
ESTATE OF LUCILLE J. SMITH, DORIS MARIE MONTESDEOCA and HARMONY HOME CARE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE DOUTHERD
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Kyle Roig, et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 21-11915
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL OLIVERA, an individual, THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, by and through its Personal Representative Gail Olivera, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Jay Hannah v. UPS
as 21-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAY HANNAH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
