Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 50,003
Brandon et al v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff: Chester Brandon, III
Defendant: Commissioner William K. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
US v. William Flinn, Jr.
as 24-4293
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM ALBERT FLINN, JR.
CRANDALL v. KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JOHN CRANDALL
Defendant: KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and PENOBSCOT COMMUNITY HEALTH AND COUNSELING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04072
Plaintiff: Benjamin Anderson
Defendant: DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., Stanley Jaworski, Richard Bravman and others
Houck et al v. NewRez LLC
as 1:2024cv01519
Plaintiff: William Reid Houck and Vanessa Sandra Houck
Defendant: NewRez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
Grochowski et al v. QuoteWizard.com, LLC
as 2:2024cv14162
Plaintiff: Alan Grochowski, Virginia Johnson and William Skaleski
Defendant: QuoteWizard.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Williams (Davis)
as 24-1425
Defendant: RONALD GLEN DAVIS, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, ALAN ANDERSON and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Taie, et al. v. Ten Bridges LLC, et al.
as 24-3320
Plaintiff: MARY TAIE, MOYRA COOP and WILLIAM GROVES
Defendant: TEN BRIDGES LLC and DEMIAN HEALD
USA v. Jatally Williams
as 24-5507
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JATALLY WILLIAMS
Styles et al v. The Bank of Missouri et al
as 3:2024cv03137
Plaintiff: Auria Styles, Tynia Baisden, Chilette Brown and others
Defendant: The Bank of Missouri, First Electronic Bank, Concora Credit Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?