Cases 51 - 60 of 141
Zhang et al v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv05355
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS Elaine Duke, Acting Dir., USCIS James McCament, Director USCIS David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Zhong Xi Huang and Qiu Ping Zhang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gaspar v. McCament, et al
as 5:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Pascual Luciano Tomas Gaspar
Defendant:
James McCament, Elaine Duke and Robert M. Cowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sarbpreer Singh v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2017cv01538
Defendant:
Elaine Duke, David A. Lester, James McCament and others
Plaintiff:
Sarbpreet Singh
Bhavnesh Kumar Khosla v. Elain Duke et al
as 2:2017cv06591
Defendant:
Donna Campagnolo, Robert M Cowan, Elaine C. Duke and others
Plaintiff:
Bhavnesh Kumar Khosla
MOHAMMAD POUR NEJATIAN v. DUKE et al
as 1:2017cv01832
Defendant:
ELAINE DUKE, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and others
Plaintiff:
NIMA MOHAMMAD POUR NEJATIAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
KANAWATI v. DUKE et al
as 1:2017cv01824
Plaintiff:
BILAL KANAWATI
Defendant:
ELAINE DUKE, JAMES MCCAMENT, EMILIA BARDINI and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Hu v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2017cv02363
Plaintiff:
Jiaming Hu
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Citizenship & Immigration Service , Elaine Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
LU v. MCCAMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01829
Plaintiff:
BOYANG LU
Defendant:
NICHOLAS COLUCCI , ELAINE DUKE and JAMES MCCAMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mushtaq v. McCament et al
as 4:2017cv02664
Plaintiff:
Waleed Mushtaq
Defendant:
James McCament and Elaine Duke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Erick Archila et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2017cv06491
Plaintiff:
Erick Archila and Canal A Media Holding LLC
Defendant:
Kathy A Baran, Department of Homeland Security, Elaine C. Duke and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
