Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Joan Malone v. Annette Lang-Spencer
as 10-4718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAN FRANCES MARY MALONE
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNETTE LANG-SPENCER, ANDREA LANG, JAMES A. LANG and others
MALONE v. LANG-SPENCER et al
as 2:2010cv06009
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCIS MARY MALONE
Defendant:
ANNETTE LANG-SPENCER, ANDREA LANG, JAMES A. LANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. LONG-SPENCER et al
as 1:2010cv01832
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCIS MARY MALONE
Defendant:
ANNETTE LONG-SPENCER, ANDREA LANG, JAMES A. LANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treymel Coleman et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2010cv07173
Plaintiff:
Mary Callum, Treymel Coleman, K. E. and others
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer J. Gurrola and others
Gregory A. Hall v. Gregory Alarcon et al
as 2:2010cv06301
Defendant:
Gergory Alarcon, Iliana Alvarez, Leroy D. Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Hall
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. K & M Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04110
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
K & M Transport, LLC, Mekhrybon Ashraprova and K B Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
K. M. et al v. Montgomery Public School District
as 2:2009cv01135
Plaintiff:
K. M., K. M., Linda M. and others
Defendant:
Montgomery Public School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Fernandez et al v. K-M Industries Holding Co, Inc et al
as 4:2006cv07339
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fernandez , Lora Smith and Tosha Thomas
Defendant:
K-M Industries Holding Co, Inc , K-M Industries Holding Co, Inc. ESOP Plan Committee , Wiliam E. and Desiree B. Moore Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. K&M Recycling
as 1:2009cv13381
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
K&M Recycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
