Cases 51 - 60 of 385
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Glenwood Robinson v. UPS
as 21-1129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENWOOD ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Rattler Holdings, LLC v. UPS, et al
as 21-35014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RATTLER HOLDINGS, LLC, DBA Planetary Design
Defendant / Appellee:
UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Findley v. United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) et al
as 1:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Local 804 Union (IBT) and United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS)
Plaintiff:
Josh D. Findley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kyle Roig, et al v. UPS, et al
as 20-14759
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL OLIVERA, an individual, THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, by and through its Personal Representative Gail Olivera, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Borden v. County of Costilla, Colorado, et al
as 20-1445
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, Governor: Jared Polis, CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, CEO: Richard D. Fairbank, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, CEO: Carol Tome and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD L. BORDEN
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv06696
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kreitman Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hayes v. Slankrd et al
as 3:2020cv06109
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, UPS, John Doe Slandkrd and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Hayes and Robert L Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daigle et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00726
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vance Daigle and Charlene Daigle
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Olinda Lawrence v. UPS
as 20-30576
Defendant / Appellee:
United Parcel Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Olinda F. Lawrence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
