Cases 61 - 70 of 1,125
AbduR-Rahman et al v. Mcmillion et al
as 1:2022cv07231
Plaintiff:
Yusuf' AbduR-Rahman and Jamal Ibin Yusuf AbduR-Rahman Smalls
Defendant:
Doug Mcmillion, Jim Walton, Samuel Robson Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Wright v. Minardi
as 22-11126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mack Wright and Alice Wright
Defendant / Appellant:
Raymond Sam Minardi
THIERFELDER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01674
Petitioner:
ALICE THIERFELDER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: 3M Company
as 22-0505
Petitioner:
In re: 3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Respondent:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Cockle et al v. Sabye
as 2:2022cv01575
Plaintiff:
Diana Cockle and Peter Cockle
Defendant:
Alice M Sabye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
US v. Alice Felder-Lucas
as 22-4393
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALICE FELDER-LUCAS
Hilda & Alice, Inc. v. Foodservice Partners LLC
as 3:2022cv04086
Plaintiff:
Hilda & Alice, Inc.
Defendant:
Foodservice Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Acker et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00836
Plaintiff:
Acker, Chris Stuckrath, Cory Acker and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
