Cases 61 - 70 of 149
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 4:2015cv04061
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 5:2015cv05131
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Banks v. Pivnichny
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heydenrych v. Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. et al
as 4:2015cv01470
Plaintiff:
Pieter Heydenrych
Defendant:
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P., Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P., Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv04766
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey , Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Shang et al
as 1:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
David B. Smith and Shaoming Cheng
Defendant:
Ronglan Shang, Chunyan Zhao, Jun-Ling Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Ortego et al v Lummi Island Scenic Estates Community Club, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01840
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Ortego , John S. Apolis , Victor D. Armfield and others
Defendant:
Lummi Island Scenic Estates Community Club, Inc., Mark R. Sexton, Douglas Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Carl Smith
as 14-2826
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL B. SMITH
United States of America v. Carl Smith
as 14-2780
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL B. SMITH, also known as MOO
In re: Winings
as 14-1683
Appellant:
In re: CLIFFORD L. WININGS, JOSEPH B. SHUEY, TIMOTHY A. LEMKE and others
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
