Cases 61 - 70 of 200
El Bey v. Dominguez
as 21-10081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hasseh El Bey and El Yumbe El Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney General of Texas, Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., doing business as Ken Paxton, Ronald Kent Birdsong, doing business as Kent Birdsong and others
Smith v. Paxton Media Group LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
David M Paxton and Paxton Media Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Shavonda Smith
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Young v. Paxton
as 21-10013
Defendant / Appellee:
Ken Paxton, In his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Huguette Nicole Young
Serafine v. Abbott et al
as 1:2020cv01249
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Serafine
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Pittman
as 20-40832
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Jaquez Reed, Captain Amanda K. Buchanek, Kristi L. Pittman, Senior Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reidie James Jackson
Young v. Paxton
as 20-11124
Defendant / Appellee:
Ken Paxton, In his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Huguette Nicole Young
Bay Area Unitarian Universalist Church et al v. Paxton et al
as 4:2020cv03081
Defendant:
Chief of Houston PD Art Acevedo, County Attorney Vince Ryan, Presiding Officer Kim Lemaux and others
Plaintiff:
Drink Houston Better, LLC d/b/a Antidote Coffee, Bay Area Unitarian Universalist Church, Perk You Later, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Arndt v. Hatfield, et al
as 20-6128
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBARA HATFIELD, individually and in her official capacity as Special District Judge for Canadian County, OK, YWCAOKC, STACY DILLARD, individually and in her official capacity as an attorney for the Department of Human Services for the State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ARNDT, individually and as representative of all persons similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
