Cases 71 - 80 of 883
Weigman v. Wertz
as 2:2022cv02112
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Weigman
Defendant:
Ed Wertz, Andy Strove, Linda Rold and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
O'Dell v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10211
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael E. Dee and others
Glanville v. Usertesting, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07568
Plaintiff:
Alex Glanville
Defendant:
Usertesting, Inc., Andy Macmillan, Darrell Benatar and others
Flores v. US
as 23-106
Petitioner:
ERIC FLORES
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA LORENZA FLORES, JAVIER VENSOR FLORES, ANDY FLORES and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Haping et al v. 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09843
Plaintiff:
ZIQI ZHANG
Petitioner:
Sibo Ma, Wong Haping and He Xianghong
Defendant:
17 Education & Technology Group Inc., Andy Chang Liu, Michael Chao Du and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23743
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
He v. Chen et al
as 2:2022cv01564
Plaintiff:
Hai Ping He
Defendant:
Andy Ching Fong Chen and Aero Space Port International Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
US v. Andy Tovar
as 22-4584
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDY TOVAR, a/k/a Fearless
Andy Onwuka, Jr. v. USDC-CASA
as 22-70210
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ANDY KEJADI ONWUKA, Jr. and JEFFREY LYNCH
Petitioner:
ANDY KEJADI ONWUKA, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA
Jodie Drange, et al v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, et al
as 22-80101
Petitioner:
JODIE DRANGE and ANDY DRANGE, each individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated
Respondent:
MOUNTAIN WEST FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1 - 100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
