Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Michel Bah v. Eric Holder
as 09-3105
Petitioner:
MICHEL DEMBA BAH
Respondent:
MARK FILIP, Acting Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Aka Ayemou, et al v. Dow Chemical Company
as 08-80174
Plaintiff - Respondent:
AKA GEORGES AYEMOU, ATTEKE ADOLPHE AYEMOU, NOGBOU ANATOLE AYEMOU and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Tahiru Bah v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 08-1873
Petitioner:
TAHIRU BAH
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Bah v. Radder et al
as 1:2008cv02060
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Bah, Mohamed Bah and Mohamed Bah
Defendant:
Kadie Radder, Nadim Radder and Aminata Mansary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAH v. KLAPAKIS et al
as 2:2008cv03504
Plaintiff:
ALPHA BAH
Defendant:
EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS, JONATHAN SCHARFEN, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi et al v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi, Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi, Oumar Bah and others
Defendant:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company, Amadou Ba, Abdoul Diallo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bah v. Atty Gen USA
as 08-2119
Not Party - Petitioner:
AISSATTOU BAH
Not Party - Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA
Bah v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02731
Plaintiff:
Alpha Oumar Bah
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and Amy Palmer
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03805
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bah v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007mi00324
Plaintiff:
Alpha Oumar Bah
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and Amy Palmer
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
