Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00161
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Government Employees Insurance v. Infinity Health Products, Ltd.
as 12-2197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., Geico General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Infinity Health Products, Ltd., ILya Mugerman, MSSA Corp. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Oksana Kovalenko
Kannala et al v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2012cv01516
Plaintiff:
Jomon Kannala , John Thomas , Sonny Poozhikala and others
Defendant:
John Doe #1 , John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc v. David A Crotts & Associates Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
David A Crotts & Associates Inc , David A Crotts , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joplin v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as TNE/1:12-cv-00073
Plaintiff:
Deborah Joplin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and others
O'Brien v. Blooms Today Family of Brands et al
as 3:2012cv30041
Plaintiff:
Thomas O'Brien
Defendant:
Blooms Today Family of Brands , Blooms Rewards LLC , Blooms Rewards Platinum Club and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard McDowell v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2011cv08312
Defendant:
Doe 1 through Doe 10 and General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard McDowell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
