Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 142
IM Skaugen Marine Services PTE LTD v. Gengmin
as 4:2013mc00433
Plaintiff: IM Skaugen Marine Services PTE LTD
Defendant: Qiu Gengmin
IM Skaugen Marine Services PTE v. Qiu Gengmin
as 13-3551
Plaintiff - Appellee: IM SKAUGEN MARINE SERVICES PTE LTD
Defendant - Appellant: QIU GENGMIN
Mahon v. IMS Health Inc
as 3:2013cv01192
Petitioner: James Mahon
Respondent: IMS Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
SYMPHONY HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al v. IMS HEALTH INCORPORATED We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04290
Plaintiff: SYMPHONY HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORPORATION , SOURCE HEALTHCARE ANALYTICS LLC and IMPACTRX, INC.
Defendant: IMS HEALTH INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sang Yu, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71839
Petitioner: SANG UN YU and MYEONG SUK IM
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jin v. Holder
as 13-1664
Petitioner: Xing Shu Jin, AKA Song Suk Im, AKA Song Sim
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
USA v. Steven Imes, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15284
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: STEVEN IMES, III
IMS, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2012cv01615
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Plaintiff: IMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Haleigh McBride, et al v. Estis Well Service, L.L.C.
as 12-90054
Plaintiff - Petitioner: HALEIGH JANEE MCBRIDE, on behalf of IMS, individually &, BRIAN J. SUIRE and SAUL C. TOUCHET
Defendant - Respondent: ESTIS WELL SERVICE L L C
S Zachary Samuels et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 2:2012cv04287
Plaintiff: Lawrence Ash, Luana L Ash, Koon Shik Choi and others
Defendant: City of Los Angeles, Does, Federal Highway Administration and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?