Cases 71 - 80 of 57,698
Bowman v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
John Eli Bowman
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Deputy Michael Spencer, Deputy Haddix and others
Greene v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 6:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
John Greene
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Marquez v. Silver
as 24-1555
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS MARQUEZ
Defendant:
LAUREN DESOLE, individually, GEORGE SILVER, individually, LAWRENCE MARKS, individually and others
United States of America v. Brosnan
as 24-3644
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN BROSNAN
Estate of Ian Simmers v. King County - State of Washington, et al.
as 24-3636
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF IAN SIMMERS, by and through administrator Donna Berube
Defendant:
KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, CITY OF BOTHELL, EDWARD J. HOPKINS, Detective and others
Matthews v. Eagle Lending, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02524
Plaintiff:
Madelaine Matthews
Defendant:
Eagle Lending, LLC doing business as Fineday Funds, Wolf River Development Company, Gena Kakkak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ortega v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lawrence v. Kalm Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11493
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lawrence
Defendant:
Kalm Financial Inc., Cross Mortgage LLC, Amend Finance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: John Doe Juror Number Seven
as 2:2024cv01067
Not Yet Classified:
Juror John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
