Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-17833
Plaintiff:
Denise Davis and Robert Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Franklin Reaves, et al v. Black Farmers Assoc. Settle, et al
as 12-5313
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Franklin C. Reaves, Roger Arnold, Cassandra Graham and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sarah Simon-Arnold, Reverend
Defendant - Appellee:
Black Farmers Association Settlement Administrator and EPIQ Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc.
US v. Benjamin Davi
as 12-4778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BENJAMIN ROBERT DAVIS
In Re: Robert Davie
as 12-3751
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT DAVIES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Raphiel Davis v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-60541
Petitioner:
RAPHIEL ROBERT DAVIS, also known as Super Alien Davis, also known as Raphiel Davis
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
REAVES et al v. BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, SARAH SIMON-ARNOLD, ROGER ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-02682
Plaintiff:
BYRON EVANS , ALVA EVANS , MIKE BARTRUM and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
SERP v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2012cv02552
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. SERP
Defendant:
ROBERT DAVIS, PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, CHARLES J. HOPKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
