Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 732
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv05484
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sepulveda-Medina v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 19-1052
Plaintiff: ANTONIO VELEZ-MARTINEZ, NAYDA ROSA ALVAREZ-MORALES, ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ-VELAZQUEZ and others
Defendant: ISLAND FINANCE CORPORATION, COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CREDITO DE CIALES, ROOSEVELT CAYMAN ASSETS COMPANY I and others
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, OPERATING PARTNERS COMPANY, LLC., UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDDIE MANUEL SEPULVEDA-MEDINA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01501
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Franklin v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03852
Plaintiff: Ricky R. Franklin
Defendant: CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01197
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ishutkina v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 19-1661
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tatyana Ishutkina and Nikolay Synkov
Defendant / Appellee: CitiMortgage, Inc.
US v. Scott
as 19-1506
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Interested Party: SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00288
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Scott
as 19-1701
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner: MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Oparaji et al
as 1:2019cv02081
Plaintiff: CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant: Ada Oparaji and Maurice Oparaji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?