Cases 81 - 90 of 2,830
Reiner v. Navarette, et al.
as 23-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN REINER
Defendant / Appellee:
JORGE NAVARETTE, TOM ZHANG, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE and others
Nisbet v. Bridger
as 23-3877
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW CHARLES NISBET
Respondent / Appellee:
SPIRIT ROSE BRIDGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Johnathon Rose
as 23-3560
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Johnathon Lawrence Rose
Hymon v. Rose, et al.
as 23-3659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK L. HYMON
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer ROSE, LVMPD - Dismissed #3 and GLEN O'BRIEN, District Attorney - Dismissed #3
Salaiz v. VSC Operations LLC
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Rose Salaiz
Defendant:
VSC Operations LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Comapny d/b/a North American Auto Care
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. OLYMPIA EARLY LEARNING CENTER et al
as 2:2023mc00149
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
OLYMPIA EARLY LEARNING CENTER, STEVE OLSON and ROSE HORGDAHL
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA LASPROGATA
Counter Claimant:
ALICIA MENDOZA, G.S.J., AMANDA MYRICK and others
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
MILLER v. USA
as 1:2023cv01971
Plaintiff:
MARLA ROSE MILLER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
