Cases 1 - 10 of 2,152
Burton et al v. Bluefield Realty Group, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
Shauntell Burton, Benny D. Cheatham, Robert Douglass and others
Defendant:
Bluefield Realty Group, LLC, Allen Tate Real Estate, LLC, McClendon Realty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
CARTHAN et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
BILLY CARTHAN, DAVIS DENTON, CLAY GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
William Graham v. United States
as 24-2131
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
United States of America
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Graham v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc
as 4:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Denise Graham
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Niekamp et al. v. Watts Guerra LLP et al.
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Christopher J niekamp, Randall D. Hebrink and Christopher J. Niekamp
Defendant:
Watts Guerra, LLP, Bassford Remele, PA, Gustafson Gluek, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Graham v. Edmark
as 24-1456
Petitioner:
MELVIN C. GRAHAM
Respondent:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison for Men
Graham v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
as 4:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Denise Graham
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
