Cases 1 - 10 of 1,514
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Phillips et al v. Energy Northwest
as 4:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
David Holmes and Shannon Buck Phillips
Defendant:
Energy Northwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Whittingham v. Tress
as 24-2047
Defendant:
Moishe Tress, DAVID KRISS, FIRST AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TREVOR WHITTINGHAM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02481
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Koffski et al v. 3M Company et al
as ILN/1:24-cv-05508
Defendant:
3M Company, Kidde Fire Fighting Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Koffski, Joseph Ramirez, Edward Grunauer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Douglas, et al v. EF Institute for Cultural Exchange, Inc., et al
as 24-8019
Plaintiff:
WENDY STOTSENBURG, SARA ADAMSKI, ERIN HAZELWOOD and others
Respondent:
EF EDUCATION FIRST INTERNATIONAL, LTD., EF EXPLORE AMERICA, INC. and EF INSTITUTE FOR CULTURAL EXCHANGE, INC., a California corporation
Petitioner:
THOMAS AIKINS, SARA KAHL and MELISSA DOUGLAS
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES TOUR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
EF EDUCATION FIRST INTERNATIONAL, AG, a Swiss corporation, a/k/a EF Education First International, Ltd.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
